AI Question Generation + Socratic Review
5 question types + generation prompt + 10 levels of questioning to test real understanding + 8 review methods and an applicable-exam list.
AI Question Generation: 5 Types
Don't generate questions randomly — pick the type by purpose, so the test is effective:
| Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Basic concept | Verify definition understanding |
| Integrated application | Cross-chapter chaining |
| Error-prone | Common traps |
| Past-paper variants | Adapted from real exams |
| Prediction | Based on syllabus trends |
The accompanying prompt — question generation flows straight into questioning:
Generate questions for me based on the following knowledge points:
Knowledge points: [fill in]
Requirements:
1. 3 basic questions + 2 advanced ones
2. Attach explanations and point tags to each question
3. Mark difficulty (1-5 stars)
4. After generating, use Socratic questioning to test whether I truly understandSocratic Questioning: 10 Levels to Test Real Understanding
"Looks understood" is not "truly understood". Let AI probe layer by layer — blind spots surface on their own:
| Level | Direction | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Concept definition | "Explain this concept in your own words" |
| 2 | Preconditions | "Under what conditions does this conclusion hold?" |
| 3 | Solution method | "What method did you use? Why that one?" |
| 4 | Variant thinking | "If the conditions change, does the answer change?" |
| 5 | Counterexample | "Can you give an example where it fails?" |
| 6 | Error attribution | "If you got it wrong, which step most likely failed?" |
| 7 | Knowledge linking | "How does this relate to what we learned before?" |
| 8 | Real-world use | "What real problem can this knowledge solve?" |
| 9 | Teach others | "How would you explain it to a complete beginner?" |
| 10 | Transfer & create | "Can you compose a similar question yourself?" |
Answering "I don't know" is far more useful than bluffing — the point of questioning is finding blind spots, and every one found is a gain.
Bonus: 8 Review & Verification Methods
Socratic questioning isn't the only way. Combine the methods below freely as suits you — no need to use all of them. Core principle: verification beats repetition.
| Method | Definition | Best for | Difficulty | Needs AI | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socratic | Sequential probing exposes blind spots | All subjects | ⭐⭐⭐ | Recommended | 15-30min |
| Feynman | Explain in plain words to a novice | Concept-heavy | ⭐⭐ | Optional | 20-40min |
| Bloom's 6 levels | Remember → understand → apply → analyze → evaluate → create | Theory subjects | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Recommended | 30-60min |
| Error reversal | Ask "why did I think that way" | Math / logic | ⭐⭐ | Optional | 10-20min |
| Active recall | Recall before checking answers | Memory subjects | ⭐ | Not needed | 10-15min |
| Interleaved testing | Mixed question types train judgment | Science综合 | ⭐⭐⭐ | Recommended | 20-30min |
| Self-explanation | Speak out the reason for each step | Problem-solving subjects | ⭐⭐ | Not needed | 15-25min |
| PIXAR cases | Deconstruct knowledge via story structure | Liberal arts / case-based | ⭐⭐⭐ | Recommended | 20-40min |
Recommended combo: Socratic (deep verification) + active recall (daily consolidation) + error reversal (pre-exam sprint). Together they cover the full chain of "understand → memorize → correct".
Bonus: These Exams Work Too
The methods above apply not only to entrance exams, postgraduate exams, and finals — the certification exams below work the same way: AI planning, meta-question induction, question generation, and Socratic questioning, all in one flow.
| Category | Exams |
|---|---|
| Language | IELTS / TOEFL / GRE · CATTI · Putonghua proficiency |
| Teaching | Teaching certificates (K-12) · Teacher recruitment · Special-post teachers |
| Legal / public | Bar exam · Civil service · Public institutions |
| Accounting / finance | CPA · Junior / intermediate accounting · CFA / FRM · securities / funds |
| IT / internet | Soft exam (mid/senior) · PMP · AWS / Alibaba Cloud certifications |
| Medical / health | Licensed physician · Licensed pharmacist · Nurse certificate · Health manager |
| Engineering | Constructor level 1/2 · Cost engineer · Fire engineer · Safety engineer |
| SOE / internal | Compliance exams · Promotion exams · Skill certifications · Safety training |
The core logic never changes: whatever the exam, it's the four-step loop of "plan → meta-questions → drill → question". Feed your syllabus and materials to AI, and the Skill adapts automatically.
Meta-Question Method: Escape the Question Sea
Question-sea tactics vs. meta-question induction + systems thinking + 7-step extraction flow + a Gaokao math function case.
Assignment: Build Your AI Exam-Prep Workflow
Three progressive levels — reproduce the plan → extract meta-questions → build the workflow.
Tutorials